The proposed merger between Southern Championship club Olympia FC Warriors and NPL Tasmania club Clarence Zebras is off
The newly announced president of the combined club which would have resulted from the merger, George Mamacas, has stepped away and released the following statement:
“I regret to advise that the merger between Olympia FC and Clarence Zebras will not proceed.
“At the Board meeting held on Monday evening I moved a motion that the name of the club for purposes of legalities, bank accounts etc remain Clarence Olympia FC Zebras but trading as Spirit FC.
“I proposed that the club be marketed and play its games as Spirit FC.
“I envisioned a future of chaos and confusion amongst players, supporters and sponsors with the COZ name being long convoluted and unworkable from a marketing perspective.
“On Tuesday evening I was informed that Olympia FC was moving away from the merger. They informed me it was because Olympia FC members wanted Olympia to be part of the name.
“It was made clear to them that the name Olympia had remained as the official name with the on-field and marketing name being Spirit FC.
“This in my view fulfilled the members’ request for the name Olympia.
“This club, to work, needed a fresh start with a vibrant new launch which included a new on the field branding.
“Spirit FC was by most agreed to be perfect for this new club. Sadly, some on the Olympia side did not agree.
“As there is no longer a merger I have stepped away.”
The Olympia club has also issued a statement:
To Olympia Members.
After a thorough review and due diligence process, we regret to announce that the proposed merger between Olympia FC Warriors and Clarence Zebras FC will not move forward.
Despite the strong potential for collaboration, due diligence uncovered certain factors that couldn't be reconciled.
Both parties have worked diligently, but we have determined that the timing and conditions are not right for this partnership.
The decision to not proceed with the merger was made by Olympia.
Olympia FC Warriors remain focused on our goals, continue to strengthen our respective teams and work towards a successful 2025 season for all our teams.
Regards,
Olympia FC Warriors.
Not for the first time.
ReplyDeleteMany, many, many moons ago there was a concerted push for Olympia and Taroona to merge. Olympia were training at Taroona at the time.
One of the reasons it didn't happen was due to the requirement that Olympia be in the new club name.
I think it is also important for me to point out that due diligence was in its infancy. Documents were still being sourced for a review by an appointed accountant. The Olympia FC statement suggesting there was a completion or thorough review done is not accurate. The inference that the club walked away for this reason is not the case. I feel for the Clarence Zebras board. They have been nothing but honest, transparent, excited and keen to make this work. To put it mildly Olympia have been stretching the truth in their press release to their members.
ReplyDeleteI wish Clarence Zebras FC all the best.
GM you are lucky this occurred this point and not further down the track. Zebras need all the help they can get but Ido not believe access to your financial kindness is fair.
ReplyDeleteThey have created the situation they are in and I believe that if the club folds then be it on the board head as they have created this farcical situation.
Good luck to Olympia also and work to get ack in the NPL
Zebras hold an NPL licence, Olympia don't!!! Zebras will be fine, but Olympia have missed a great oportunity and I can't see them ever getting into the NPL.
DeletePrior to there special meeting the board advised that if the merge didnt happen, the whole board would resign! I hope they have stood by this????
As I understood it the board was going to stand down if the vote did not get up at the meeting to progress to the next stage ie due diligence, to make sure they were getting what they voted for. Obviously they felt they weren’t so they acted accordingly and pulled the plug as they said they would at the meeting.
DeleteThanks to them for being honest and taking into account what there members actually voted for….
There is no pathway for Olympia and NPL, Olympia at best will become a social club at worst they will dissolve
ReplyDeleteMerge with barnestonworth.....the Olympia barnestonworth warriors!!! Kings of div 4
DeleteAbout time. Some common sense.
ReplyDeleteRumour is that 5 out of the 8 resigned.
ReplyDeleteHow can this occur when the vote with the financial members was overwhemingly in favour of merging. Well good luck in paying the 230k unpaid bills and loans, good luck with finding 1.5 M to replace the grass( five years overdue), good luck finding 500k to replace the wiring and lights that keep blowing. Do you really think that the yes voters now will continue supporting Olympia. What an opportunity lost to build a big club based on the eastern shore. The people with the loudest voices need to all stand up and put your money where your mouths are
ReplyDeleteTotally agree. Small group of people living on the past & dreaming too much. Was a ripper club for many years. Once George left it was all down hill. The opportunity was there to once again make it great with the chance of the Super Club. With money & brains behind the wheel & obviously CZ & GM we’re happy to work together. The brainless few who wouldn’t agree to a name change need to stand out the front, across the road & look at the big picture. It’s an embarrassment! The pitch, the fences, the overall presentation of the entrance. Mmmmm, can’t see them being able to afford to resurrect any of this anytime soon. Farewell Warriors!
DeleteMaybe a blessing for Zebras that this merger failed.
DeleteRelistically moving forward Olympia needs to market themselves as a family club for the youth to develop. Youth meaning 13 and under. Until there are drastic changes it is a social club. Now mamacas has stepped away they need another cashed up/leader of the community to step forward and lead the club out of this mess.
ReplyDeleteMoney talks and George walks
Money does not fix everything especially everything related to football. Do Olympia really have another as financial as GM who is happy to kiss millions goodbye for the sake of a game? That is not an investment and that is why I say kiss millions goodbye.
DeleteOlympia need an injection of new people and any existing people must listen and take note.
Going down the same old road year after year has not and does not work.
Once were Warriors
ReplyDeleteThe Zebras board needs to really think about if they want to lead this club or not, if not make it known and hopefully some new blood will step up.
ReplyDeleteI think all three clubs are in trouble not just Olympia. NPL will fall apart. Football TAS is trying to run the same competitions as the mainland but we don’t have the numbers. Tassie is a AFL state and they can’t even sustain a statewide league , so how is Football TAS going to sustain it. Also Clarence Zebras must be in financial trouble for them to ask George to merge. Having an NPL license doesn’t mean they will be alright. They have had an NPL license for how many years now,They will continue to struggle. Football tas has a lot to answer for as they keep making the same mistakes over and over again.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. Then the brains trust want to add in more teams to the already weakened NPL. AFL and Basketball are the winners in the state as FFT were too slow. Just have to look at the amount of juniors now playing basketball and football in schools compared the soccer. She is a dead concept this state league now.
DeleteSpirit??? Isnt that the name propsed for a Metro takeover once apon a time
ReplyDeleteFunny how people act when they don’t get their own way…
ReplyDeleteFrom the outside looking in… All well and good to be trading as Clarence Olympia FC Zebras.. but the new ‘President’ couldn’t adhere to the first dot point of the merger plan and blames everyone else for his own mistakes…. And continues to fire pot shots
Classic GM.
When George came back to Hobart Olympic his first job was to bring back the Olympia name. I’m guessing it was important to him. Now it’s about not wanting to be the president of Clarence and Zebras. The Olympia name is just collateral damage
ReplyDeleteSo is South East utd going to be able to fill all the underage teams to gain an NPL License, or is FFT going to change the bar again as they do every year. Is there anyone who can enlighten me on what is needed for an NPL license.
ReplyDeleteFft 😂
DeleteThe real issue here is that these clubs considered a merger. Now it's either mis management which I'm sure there has been , but what I'm even more sure about is lack of funding. Real football has highest youth enrolment, but looses them all to AFL... How can this improve??
ReplyDeleteWith AFL coming , football is dead in this state.
ReplyDeleteYou could play Benny Hill music in the background of this post!
ReplyDeleteDidn't George talk of a seamless transition?
He and DJ should be expelled from any administrative position within sports clubs.
They are a disgrace. What a mess - it's a poor look for the sport and it's no wonder were not taken seriously.
All this commotion and to walk away because of a few letters in a name. Lol
ReplyDeleteThe Olympia members voted YES to the Merger as long as the Olympia name survives. Clarence agreed to that condition.
ReplyDeleteSo George let the Merger collapse because he couldn’t reverse the deal agreed on between the 2 clubs. Both clubs may have dodged a bullet
Good luck then, Olympia will only be a championship league team while based at warrior park. Aren’t you listening the ground will never get approval for NPL
Delete9.38AM You are assuming that Olympia have to stay at Warrior Park. They don’t!
DeleteIt’s about time things at Clarence changed ! Unfortunately without someone with the brains and go forward thinking like George at the helm it’s just going to be another disastrous few years ahead even if they can field a side of decent players willing to join the club for the peanuts they shell out
ReplyDeleteThis is about as funny as South Hobart thinking they are good enough to play in a Mainland competition
ReplyDeleteSouth are closer to playing in that comp than these two clubs are to improve for the better. They have tried for years and are getting worse. And can we please stop teferring to the 3 clubs? It is it should I say was, Olympia and Clarence, not Olympia Clarence and Zebras. Two clubs cannot play as one .
DeleteSouth could very well be competing in a mainland competition if they win the NPL next year https://www.footballaustralia.com.au/news/football-australia-unveils-new-format-and-start-date-national-second-tier-competition?fbclid=IwY2xjawGZI7ZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHSqn-0dmFCEcuzM9n4-9JLUzzvlsdX_NuKFM5KyQBqoVwoY4cPmLA_pQcQ_aem_echbwzVEFjEuM46RWVF7Kg
DeleteThe whole NPL set up is washed now. Go back to northern and southern conference with cross over games like the NBA.
ReplyDeleteThis is tiring. How is the NPL so washed?
DeleteHave you watch a game? Standard is no way as good as the first few years it started. No promotion for it statewide.
DeleteFair comment. Take away imports from each team and it would not be a laughing stock
DeleteIt’s so funny to watch everyone bitching about the politics of football, just play the game and let the sport develop overtime. Rome wasn’t built in a day.
ReplyDeleteYeah. But we’re not waiting that long.
DeleteRome was built in a day .
DeleteIt took me 6 days to work it out one day to build it lol
You new here? How long are we expected to wait? Rome was built quicker than FFT can sort their shit out.
DeleteWhat is the issue with an 8 team state wide comp. I have no idea why people are constantly complaining. Please enlighten me
ReplyDeleteIt is not sustainable
Deletehow is it not sustainable. I hear alot of complaining but not a lot of reasons why it’s so bad.
DeleteDisagree
ReplyDeleteCan anybody tell me how the NPL is sustainable
ReplyDeleteAnon 7.02. Maybe all those that keep saying it’s unsustainable can explain how and why it’s unsustainable? It keeps getting mentioned but never any reasons backing up the statements.
DeleteBeen going for 11 years despite people saying each year that it will collapse. Only 1
DeleteTeam voluntarily dropped out (rangers), 2 team merged(Clarence, Zebras) and clubs wanting to be involved(South East, Ulverstone, Olympia). This year was one of the best finishes to the NPL season with 3 teams a chance in the final rounds.
Yet to hear a reason otherwise, sounds like a whole lot of winging to me.
DeleteIt isn't, but FT will stick with it as their bosses on the Mainland tell them what to do.
DeleteJust because the NPL hasn't folded, doesn't mean it's not a joke of a competition.
DeleteLook at the bottom teams since inception:
Launnie United - 1 win in 2 seasons (0.5 wins / year). STILL IN COMP.
Clarence United - 8 wins in 4 seasons (2 wins / year). MERGED - STILL IN COMP.
Riverside - 18 wins in 6 years (3 wins / year). STILL IN COMP.
Rangers = GONE and suffering.
Warriors = GONE and suffering.
Every year it is South, Dev and Knights to compete. Its boring.
Kingo and Laun City take some points here and there, show some promise but don't deliver, have maybe have a say in who wins it.
There is no real need for the struggling teams mentioned above to get better. As long as they hold the license, it doesn't matter the result.
We don't have enough quality teams to genuinely compete each year. And we don't have relegation / promotion to create some pressure to perform and entertainment.
It might be sustainable in the sense that yes - the competition might continue into the future. But it's not entertaining. It's boring. The engagement is low. I remember 10-15 years ago when Walter's blogs were firing. People WANTED to chat about how fierce the competition and particular games were. People would watch the big games in their thousands. Now it's a few mums and nans. It's dying..
The standard of players isn’t sustainable that’s for sure if you look past the top 3 teams
DeleteI'd say a lot of NPL sustainability comes down to the good old filthy lucre. However have no idea if FT properly fund the NPL and wider soccer in the state. Their last Financial Report on their website is for 2021. Their last annual report also for 2021 was just a couple of plain pages of text - compare it to any mainland federation report - clearly money must be too tight to mention (great song that).
ReplyDeleteIt’s a joke the are continuing their incompetent’s and even with New Leadership.
DeleteAnon 4.50. Presuming again? Money too tight to mention ??
DeleteHow about getting the facts before presuming?
Anon 4pm
ReplyDeleteThe fact the league has continued to operate over a continued period of time is a pretty solid argument against your non sustainable point.
In 2024 there were 3 teams that could have won the league on its last day. Just so you are aware that is 3 out of 8 teams. Just under half. Quite remarkable. This year we also saw 2 teams in a final that had not made a final for a number of years.
Riverside and Launceston city both took points of top 4 sides on more then 1 occasion.
Arguments once again that are fact that point towards league growth.
In 2025 there will be 3 NPL coaches that are full time and from outside the state. Perhaps showing Tasmania as a footballing destination for coaches.
I accept your valid point regarding performances of clubs and their lack of wins over a period of time.
That argument could lack merit of the league were expanded to 10 perhaps United may feature some wins, would that then negate your argument ?
The reality is if something isn't sustainable it dies and to my eyes clubs seem to be improving rather then declining across the board.
The Women’s League is a prime example it’s going backwards big time .
DeleteAhh yes of course, the grand finale! And how many mums and nans attended on this spectacular last day? Be lucky to push 100.
Deletesustainable
Delete/səˈsteɪnəbl/
adjective
1.
able to be maintained at a certain rate or level.
This is literally what I said - "It might be sustainable in the sense that yes - the competition might continue into the future. But it's not entertaining."
I stand by that still, even despite it coming to the last day - it's still boring. As I pointed out, it's always between the same three, which you just confirmed. The quality isn't there. The hype isn't there. There is no atmosphere at the games. AKA it isn't sustainable. It will keep dropping over the next few years like it has the last. Especially with the AFL Tas team. See ya later potential footballers, they've just changed codes. If you think there is league growth then you are absolutely delusional.
If the NPL opens to 10 teams, we dilute the competition even more.. so yes, more worse teams, and yes maybe Laun United will get some wins? That doesn't make them any better, or any more competitive against the top 4. I don't really get your point here.
Anyway, there is literally no point complaining. FFT won't do anything about it.
Anon 4.00 pm 11/11. You should have been around in the 80s and 90s.
ReplyDeleteI was around in the 90’s and I remember all the old timers saying the standard had dropped and I should have been around in the 70’s
DeleteThe Current Standard is woeful in the NPL and WSL .
DeleteWhat three coaches are full time if you don’t mind me asking?
ReplyDeleteSouth hobart Riverside, Devonport
ReplyDeleteKen Morton was not a full time South Hobart coach. The majority of time was spent working/ managing the soccer school. That is not owned by South Hobart and he only coached them on part time basis.
DeleteAnd Knights and Kingborough…
DeleteAnon 12.31
ReplyDeleteThe mind boggles. Same 3 teams in an 8 team competition. Literally just under half of the league are very close do you understand how rare that is? In any competition?
Devenport and River are the only two clubs with full time coaches.
ReplyDeleteAnon 4pm
ReplyDeleteHow is 3 teams competing for the league boring? That's the case in every league at every level, 2-3 teams compete for the title every year and you have mid-table sides and bottom of the ladder sides. If you're really good, you play for one of the top teams, if you're average or not so good you could get a game at a lower team, nothing wrong or boring with that.
And if it's really that boring and uninteresting to you, just don't watch it, simple.
Sounds like a lot of moaning for no reason. If promotion and relegation gets introduced we will see comments like: that ruined the league, fft have no clue, there are teams that are happy to play champ blah blah blah
Go support your favorite team and enjoy the league for what it is. If it pisses you off, just don't watch it. Better solution than constantly bagging out teams, leagues, organization and so forth
Anon Nov 12 10.04PM
ReplyDeleteYes, thanks for explaining fractions and percentages mate I appreciate that.
You simply don’t get it.
Of course having 3 teams on the last day having an opportunity to win, is a good thing. I don’t deny that. But it’s always the same 3. And the rest of the teams fail to improve, with some collapsing.
3 of 8 teams (LITERALLY just under half, that’s 37.5% in case you’re wondering!) have won less than 3 games / year since they joined the NPL.
But whatever. Please go and enjoy your super sustainable NPL comp with heaps of week to week excitement, and big fan turnouts!
I do happily and fully understanding that sports isn't always going to entertain you. If you want 100% guaranteed entertainment go and watch a marvel film.
DeleteHere endeth the lesson you whinge.
6:03 pm What can be done to fix it then.
ReplyDeleteResponse to November 13, 2024 at 3:05 PM
ReplyDeleteYes, that is common with how leagues should work. Ie., few teams compete, few teams mid table, few teams battle. Unfortunately, it's just the same teams every year.
A question for you guys supporting the current structure - If the competition is so exciting, can you explain why the numbers are so low at games? That final day extravaganza mentioned above where the league was decided, had maximum 200 people attend?