With four games remaining, the situation at the top of the NPL Tasmania standings is exciting.
Each one of the leading four teams could win the title, but as the end of the league season approaches, it is looking more and more likely that either Glenorchy Knights or South Hobart will claim the title.
Knights shrugged off Riverside Olympic and won 4-0 away at Windsor Park on Saturday.
Riverside did go close on a couple of occasions, but Knights had obviously recovered well from their trip to New South Wales in midweek, where they lost 3-0 to NWS Spirit in the Round-of-32 of the Australia Cup.
Stefan Cordwell gave them an early lead and Joshua Redfearn added a second midway through the first half to make victory almost inevitable, although they did leave the coup de grace very late.
Cordwell and Redfearn both completed their braces with goals in the 89th and 93rd minutes respectively.
South Hobart again sailed perilously close to disaster against bottom-side Launceston United at Birch Avenue.
The precocious Harrison Oates, surely the best young talent in the competition, gave South Hobart a 2-1 lead by the 47th-minute mark.
Charlie Reynolds had made it 1-1 within a minute of Oates’s first goal.
But, strikes by Austin Yost and Alex Walter appeared to have sealed the win for the visitors by midway through the second half.
South Hobart’s defensive frailties then showed themselves again as two goals by David Owusu, the second deep into stoppage time, made it one goal the difference.
South hung on for the remaining seconds to win by the odd goal and save themselves from acute embarrassment.
Devonport City, the reigning and increasingly likely outgoing champions, downed Launceston City 2-0 with goals by Brody Denehey and captain Kieran Mulraney.
Denehey’s goal came early in the game and Mulraney’s in the last 10 minutes, which indicates the home side must have had plenty of time to salvage the game.
Launceston City have capable players and a more than a useful team, but for some reason they cannot put things together and click when it matters.
On the Friday night, Kingborough Lions United did what they had to do and put away an inept Clarence Zebras side 3-0 at Lightwood Park.
The state of the refurbished pitch prompts a few questions. Players and referees regularly slip and fall on the surface and there was a strange double side-line on one side of the pitch nearest the club rooms. I know it should not have happened, but on two occasions, a player taking a throw-in in that area of the pitch took it from the second line inside the genuine side-line. It was a Clarence Zebras player on both occasions so that shows they weren’t really switched on. And, the referee ordered the player to retake the throw-in. I’m just wondering whether the throw should have been awarded to Kingborough instead?
Noah Mies and Kobe Kemp gave the Lions a 2-0 lead at half-time, while Tom McKernan scored the seemingly obligatory own-goal for Clarence Zebras these days midway through the second half to make it 3-0.
NPL Tasmania
Kinborough Lions United 3 (Noah Mies 26’, Kobe Kemp 39’, Tom McKernan 64’ og)
Launceston United 3 (Charlie Reynolds 36’, David Owusu 82’, 90’+5) lost to South Hobart 4 (Harrison Oates 35’, 47’, Austin Yost 53’, Alex Walter 68’)
Riverside Olympic 0 lost to Glenorchy Knights 4 (Stefan Cordwell 6’, 89’, Joshua Redfearn 24’, 90’+3)
Launceston City 0 lost to Devonport City 2 (Brody Denehey 9’, Kieran Mulraney 80’)
NPL Tasmania Standings (As at 4 August 2024)
TEAM |
P |
W |
D |
L |
F |
A |
Pts |
Glenorchy Knights |
17 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
73 |
18 |
40 |
South Hobart |
17 |
11 |
5 |
1 |
53 |
24 |
38 |
Devonport City |
17 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
42 |
17 |
35 |
Kingborough Lions |
17 |
10 |
3 |
4 |
56 |
32 |
33 |
Launceston City |
17 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
30 |
28 |
24 |
Riverside Olympic |
17 |
4 |
1 |
12 |
24 |
58 |
13 |
Clarence Zebras |
17 |
3 |
1 |
13 |
24 |
51 |
10 |
Launceston United |
17 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
12 |
92 |
0 |
30 comments:
pretty sure it was a zebs player and kingborough player on seperate occasion using the wrong line. gets your facts right, you’ve lost it.
You may well be right, cobber. In that case it doesn't say much for the two players, especially the home player. Playing at NPL level and not realising which is the correct sideline is not a good look. And, I won't stoop to your level of insult.
Well said Walter.
Odd timing for a top of the table clash…
Does anyone know why the order of games is the same every season, as in Kingborough play south first game of the season every singe year, just seems unprofessional.
Because the NPL is a closed shop and most things are rarely changed. That would involve too much work. Maintain the status quo and you don’t have to do much work as it just ticks over as always.
I feel for FT.
They are burdened by the social leagues and I lump the championship in with this. The demands the staff are put under for organise league 2 football is shit
NPL nearly needs two divisions. South, Knights, Port and Lions. Fourth players off against first in the second division for promotion and relegation. City, Zebras, Riverside and United in Div 2.
Because playing the same team 6 times a season won’t get boring…
Anon 13 August 3.36
Too many clubs in Tassie. Has been for way too long. Numbers should be reduced and clubs merged. One social team per club . If you have too many players then rotate them every week.
Way to grow the game
Agreed way to many clubs in tassie
Other then NPL its too social
Anon 9.58
The game doesn't need to grow with social football. All that needs is paint markings and 2 goals.
The top end needs support with better facilities, cheaper coaching courses and longer youth and junior seasons.
Tell me more about how having less participants will grow the game. I’m sure having less revenue from registration fees for social players will help pay for these better facilities, cheaper coaching courses and longer youth seasons you speak of.
FT are by no means a role model of sports administration, but you just need to take a look at some of the ridiculous ideas people have here to see how much worse things could be.
And the match of this weekends round in my eyes will be United VS CZ. Will be the first game United will win! Marky Mark will have a long bus trip home
Come on United!!
I wouldn’t miss this blockbuster for anything.
Is there a gate fee or will they pay us to watch it?
Imagine paying your club registration, only to play 8 games a year because your club is lucky enough to have 30-40 players for the one social team your allowed. Seems a good return on investment as a player.
Not sure how reducing the amount of genuine social teams, playing in the social competitions (Champ 1 and below) benefits the upper tiers? Employing 1-2 people to manage these competitions would be more cost effective on a cash in vs cash out basis than telling 1000+ people they can't play when rego is $300+ per year.
No argument regarding there being too many clubs though - consolidate the clubs down via mergers, field more teams from the clubs where required, and push through the decent players in a feeder system for those players that want to try and move up the football pyramid.
I wouldn’t talk down to the Championship too hard. NPL teams such as Clarence, Riverside and Launceston U would struggle in the Championship.
Let us know when and where we can catch you playing this weekend, I'm sure you'd be worth watching, looking forward to a real master-class performance.
Walter there are some weird comments (people) on this site. What are they on?
Probably would be more entertaining for the top 4 teams than rolling up to the bottom four teams knowing it will just be a win
City don’t click as coaches can’t get them to click for 2 years
Just make social football age respective ie over 25, over 30 , over 35 etc. Tie these to existing NPL clubs and championship teams. Sorry but the rest of the little clubs go.
It builds up a base of 10? Clubs in the South and anyone wanting to play will need to play at one of those clubs. You could then conceivably start a promotion / relegation set-up for the NPL. Anyway that's just my thoughts no doubt others will disagree.
Why would over 25 years be playing socials they are in their prime.
Maybe they play lower divs because the senior clubs are rubbish
Maybe they just want to play with their mates and it's got nothing to do with the clubs.
Maybe because they are not good enough to play on higher leagues. Not everyone can play at higher levels.
I hope GCC keeps the lights on tonight…
Go South Let’s take it home
Post a Comment